tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30714045.post596226006004609365..comments2008-05-13T09:37:33.856-04:00Galenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17068113556245153541noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30714045.post-60011314054769268082008-05-13T09:37:00.000-04:002008-05-13T09:37:00.000-04:00Jdm,<BR/><BR/>Syracuse really? I would much rather see one more faceless midwestern team then Coastal Carolina, there's a reason I didn't renew my season tickest for the first time in a decade. But alas, John m is right I didn't think of the odd number of teams. So how about we add a 12th member and one conf. game?Galenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17068113556245153541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30714045.post-1144609339834433552008-05-13T08:30:00.000-04:002008-05-13T08:30:00.000-04:00The Big Ten can't add just one game because of the odd number of teams. The ACC, with 12 teams, can do it week-by-week (6 more conference games gives each of the 12 teams one extra game). The Big Ten, with 11 teams, can't play an odd number of games because not all Big Ten teams can play a conference game in the same week. It's either 8 or 10 for us.John Mhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00904933804078748933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30714045.post-62549400160819702212008-05-13T08:26:00.000-04:002008-05-13T08:26:00.000-04:00I don't want another Big 10 game. With 4 non-cons, we have a shot at seeing 2 decent games, like OSU and Syracuse this year. Why would I want to play one more faceless midwestern team that we have to see every other year anyway instead of importing someone exotic like Oregon St?jdmhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10817426735000477428noreply@blogger.com